V2EX = way to explore
V2EX 是一个关于分享和探索的地方
现在注册
已注册用户请  登录
V2EX 提问指南
YAFEIML
V2EX  ›  问与答

撸了个 VPS,有亚洲优化线路,给了俩 IP,联通线路一样,电信用户帮测试下吧。

  •  
  •   YAFEIML · 2015-01-07 14:57:26 +08:00 · 8550 次点击
    这是一个创建于 3601 天前的主题,其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
    155.94.173.121
    96.44.185.162
    第 1 条附言  ·  2015-01-07 17:05:24 +08:00
    48 条回复    2015-01-08 15:08:55 +08:00
    Tink
        1
    Tink  
       2015-01-07 15:18:23 +08:00
    ~ » ping 155.94.173.121 Tink@Tink-MBP
    PING 155.94.173.121 (155.94.173.121): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=185.864 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=185.265 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=185.921 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=187.543 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=187.489 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=185.252 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=186.069 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=186.970 ms
    ^C
    --- 155.94.173.121 ping statistics ---
    8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 185.252/186.297/187.543/0.863 ms
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    ~ » ping 96.44.185.162 Tink@Tink-MBP
    PING 96.44.185.162 (96.44.185.162): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=182.010 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=180.193 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=180.489 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=177.136 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=180.508 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=178.664 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=179.259 ms
    ^C
    --- 96.44.185.162 ping statistics ---
    7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 177.136/179.751/182.010/1.448 ms
    tan9le
        2
    tan9le  
       2015-01-07 15:25:27 +08:00
    南京电信:
    tan9le@Tan9leMBP:~$ ping 155.94.173.121
    PING 155.94.173.121 (155.94.173.121): 56 data bytes
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=1004.284 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=1007.742 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=1007.759 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=1008.692 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=1006.949 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=1004.344 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=1005.173 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=1005.730 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=1004.850 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=1004.785 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=1003.852 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=1005.630 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=12 ttl=50 time=977.205 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=13 ttl=50 time=1005.508 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=14 ttl=50 time=1006.317 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=233.667 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=16 ttl=50 time=238.503 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=17 ttl=50 time=1005.876 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=18 ttl=50 time=240.830 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=19 ttl=50 time=248.724 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=20 ttl=50 time=237.846 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=22 ttl=50 time=236.511 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=23 ttl=50 time=239.278 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=24 ttl=50 time=238.825 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=25 ttl=50 time=236.062 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 26
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=27 ttl=50 time=235.681 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=28 ttl=50 time=240.008 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=29 ttl=50 time=238.882 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 30
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=31 ttl=50 time=239.630 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 32
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=33 ttl=50 time=240.070 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=34 ttl=50 time=279.780 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=35 ttl=50 time=345.317 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=36 ttl=50 time=686.867 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=37 ttl=50 time=346.453 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=38 ttl=50 time=346.084 ms
    ^C
    --- 155.94.173.121 ping statistics ---
    39 packets transmitted, 35 packets received, 10.3% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 233.667/611.820/1008.692/367.904 ms


    =======================================================

    tan9le@Tan9leMBP:~$ ping 96.44.185.162
    PING 96.44.185.162 (96.44.185.162): 56 data bytes
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=799.115 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=794.398 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=790.557 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=788.122 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=787.985 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=788.058 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=788.761 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 9
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=783.573 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=786.069 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=12 ttl=50 time=259.536 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=13 ttl=50 time=788.541 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=14 ttl=50 time=790.496 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=586.651 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 16
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=17 ttl=50 time=793.841 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 18
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=19 ttl=50 time=247.304 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 20
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=21 ttl=50 time=475.437 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=22 ttl=50 time=243.571 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=23 ttl=50 time=244.425 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 24
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=24 ttl=50 time=1008.615 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=25 ttl=50 time=1005.141 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=26 ttl=50 time=1003.974 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 28
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 29
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=30 ttl=50 time=811.363 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 31
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 32
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 33
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=33 ttl=50 time=1009.567 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 35
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=35 ttl=50 time=1004.288 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 37
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=37 ttl=50 time=1003.954 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=38 ttl=50 time=1001.312 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=39 ttl=50 time=1009.133 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 41
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=41 ttl=50 time=1003.760 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 43
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 44
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=44 ttl=50 time=1007.553 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=45 ttl=50 time=1009.032 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 47
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=48 ttl=50 time=246.026 ms
    ^C
    --- 96.44.185.162 ping statistics ---
    50 packets transmitted, 31 packets received, 38.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 243.571/763.231/1009.567/260.287 ms
    tan9le
        3
    tan9le  
       2015-01-07 15:29:30 +08:00
    为了表示我的网络没问题,下面是百度的:
    tan9le@Tan9leMBP:~$ ping www.baidu.com
    PING www.a.shifen.com (180.97.33.107): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=4.544 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=5.163 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=5.098 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=2.630 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=5.999 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=5.496 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=5.320 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=5.603 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=4.867 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=5.330 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 time=4.934 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=11 ttl=55 time=5.442 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=12 ttl=55 time=7.968 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=13 ttl=55 time=2.563 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=14 ttl=55 time=8.900 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=15 ttl=55 time=5.129 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=16 ttl=55 time=2.224 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=17 ttl=55 time=7.020 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=18 ttl=55 time=4.857 ms
    64 bytes from 180.97.33.107: icmp_seq=19 ttl=55 time=4.844 ms
    ^C
    --- www.a.shifen.com ping statistics ---
    20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 2.224/5.197/8.900/1.564 ms

    ===============================================
    下面是linode东京机房的:
    tan9le@Tan9leMBP:~$ ping speedtest.tokyo.linode.com
    PING speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=77.726 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=86.732 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=68.333 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=65.242 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=65.460 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=65.330 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=64.226 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=66.726 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=65.544 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=66.308 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=64.194 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=64.908 ms
    64 bytes from 106.187.96.148: icmp_seq=12 ttl=50 time=63.861 ms
    ^C
    --- speedtest.tokyo.linode.com ping statistics ---
    13 packets transmitted, 13 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 63.861/68.045/86.732/6.401 ms
    zhzhwcn
        4
    zhzhwcn  
       2015-01-07 15:34:07 +08:00
    PS C:\Windows\system32> ping 155.94.173.121

    正在 Ping 155.94.173.121 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=373ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=388ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=366ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=387ms TTL=52

    155.94.173.121 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 366ms,最长 = 388ms,平均 = 378ms
    PS C:\Windows\system32> ping 96.44.185.162

    正在 Ping 96.44.185.162 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=284ms TTL=51
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=266ms TTL=51
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=282ms TTL=51
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=284ms TTL=51

    96.44.185.162 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 266ms,最长 = 284ms,平均 = 279ms

    重庆电信
    bingu
        5
    bingu  
       2015-01-07 15:36:37 +08:00
    正在 Ping 155.94.173.121 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=341ms TTL=51
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=335ms TTL=51
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=328ms TTL=51
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=318ms TTL=51

    155.94.173.121 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 318ms,最长 = 341ms,平均 = 330ms

    C:\Users\Administrator>ping 96.44.185.162

    正在 Ping 96.44.185.162 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=255ms TTL=51
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=258ms TTL=51
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=276ms TTL=51
    请求超时。

    96.44.185.162 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 3,丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 255ms,最长 = 276ms,平均 = 263ms
    ilili
        6
    ilili  
       2015-01-07 15:42:20 +08:00
    正在 Ping 96.44.185.162 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=284ms TTL=51
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=282ms TTL=51
    请求超时。
    请求超时。
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=282ms TTL=51
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=281ms TTL=51
    请求超时。
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=282ms TTL=51
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=282ms TTL=51
    来自 96.44.185.162 的回复: 字节=32 时间=282ms TTL=51

    96.44.185.162 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 10,已接收 = 7,丢失 = 3 (30% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 281ms,最长 = 284ms,平均 = 282ms


    正在 Ping 155.94.173.121 具有 32 字节的数据:
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=295ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=294ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=296ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=295ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=295ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=294ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=294ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=294ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=294ms TTL=52
    来自 155.94.173.121 的回复: 字节=32 时间=295ms TTL=52

    155.94.173.121 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 10,已接收 = 10,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 294ms,最长 = 296ms,平均 = 294ms

    福建泉州电信
    iyuyue
        7
    iyuyue  
       2015-01-07 15:43:12 +08:00
    楼主能给个下载测试文件么。QuadraNet亚洲优化段比默认分配的IP ping 值低100左右。我一直想比较下载速度...
    zdkmygod
        8
    zdkmygod  
       2015-01-07 16:01:39 +08:00
    南京电信。
    第二个稳定在260+ms,不掉包;
    第一个在460+ms,有掉包。

    测了一下自己的ramnode,330+ms。
    tan9le
        9
    tan9le  
       2015-01-07 16:06:22 +08:00
    @zdkmygod
    你是南京电信家庭宽带还是企业用户?
    为什么我和你相差这么多?我现在是用的企业用户的宽带
    0x142857
        10
    0x142857  
       2015-01-07 16:07:58 +08:00
    KchanZendeMacBook-Air:zaoshu-extension kchanzen$ cd
    KchanZendeMacBook-Air:~ kchanzen$ ping 155.94.173.121
    PING 155.94.173.121 (155.94.173.121): 56 data bytes
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=424.165 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=300.636 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=378.628 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=380.176 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=396.318 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=313.290 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=644.499 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=359.810 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=381.587 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=304.979 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=11 ttl=51 time=306.374 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=12 ttl=51 time=438.467 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=13 ttl=51 time=357.519 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=14 ttl=51 time=297.362 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=15 ttl=51 time=416.273 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=16 ttl=51 time=414.395 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: icmp_seq=17 ttl=51 time=333.332 ms
    ^C
    --- 155.94.173.121 ping statistics ---
    18 packets transmitted, 17 packets received, 5.6% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 297.362/379.283/644.499/80.369 ms
    zdkmygod
        11
    zdkmygod  
       2015-01-07 16:30:40 +08:00
    @tan9le 公司宽带,10M对等带宽。
    tan9le
        12
    tan9le  
       2015-01-07 16:39:35 +08:00
    @zdkmygod 。。。。这是什么状况。。。马上就去投诉,mtr了一下,基本都丢在了221.231.191.209这个IP上,还没到骨干网。
    4. 61.155.110.137 0.0% 146 4.4 25.6 2.1 881.2 110.9
    5. 218.2.249.225 0.7% 146 4.3 7.4 3.2 40.6 5.5
    6. 221.231.191.209 95.2% 146 65.4 19.2 6.8 65.4 20.6
    7. 202.97.39.141 0.0% 146 7.9 10.7 7.4 29.4 2.5
    8. 202.97.33.14 0.7% 146 11.9 12.2 7.9 42.9 5.6
    9. 202.97.33.54 2.7% 146 13.9 13.8 8.7 50.9 5.4
    maxduke
        13
    maxduke  
       2015-01-07 16:51:43 +08:00
    上海电信+国际精品网
    ==================
    root@DiskStation:~ # ping 155.94.173.121
    PING 155.94.173.121 (155.94.173.121): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: seq=0 ttl=48 time=164.467 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: seq=1 ttl=48 time=163.708 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: seq=2 ttl=48 time=163.876 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: seq=3 ttl=48 time=164.885 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: seq=4 ttl=48 time=162.921 ms
    64 bytes from 155.94.173.121: seq=5 ttl=48 time=163.698 ms
    ^C
    --- 155.94.173.121 ping statistics ---
    6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 162.921/163.925/164.885 ms
    root@DiskStation:~ # ping 96.44.185.162
    PING 96.44.185.162 (96.44.185.162): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: seq=0 ttl=52 time=150.041 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: seq=1 ttl=52 time=143.659 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: seq=2 ttl=52 time=143.132 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: seq=3 ttl=52 time=145.027 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: seq=4 ttl=52 time=144.451 ms
    ^C
    --- 96.44.185.162 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 143.132/145.262/150.041 ms
    ooxxcc
        14
    ooxxcc  
       2015-01-07 16:55:19 +08:00
    --- 155.94.173.121 ping statistics ---
    26 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 23% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 283.706/285.889/319.000 ms

    --- 96.44.185.162 ping statistics ---
    25 packets transmitted, 23 packets received, 8% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 265.962/266.289/266.576 ms

    武汉电信
    lolicon
        15
    lolicon  
       2015-01-07 16:59:49 +08:00 via Android
    @maxduke 果然物有所值,钱没白花
    YAFEIML
        16
    YAFEIML  
    OP
       2015-01-07 17:08:40 +08:00
    @Tink 目测商业光纤
    @tan9le 已吓尿,节点有问题吧
    @zhzhwcn 96.44.185.162略好啊
    @bingu 也是电信吗?
    @zdkmygod 应该是第二个了
    @iyuyue 文件已发
    @0x142857 第二个怎么样呢
    @maxduke 物超所值
    @ooxxcc 丢包率好高啊
    zdkmygod
        17
    zdkmygod  
       2015-01-07 17:09:06 +08:00
    又测了一下,数据如下:

    --- 96.44.185.162 ping statistics ---
    103 packets transmitted, 95 received, 7% packet loss, time 102165ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 240.274/266.329/271.437/3.577 ms

    --- 155.94.173.121 ping statistics ---
    246 packets transmitted, 233 received, 5% packet loss, time 245400ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 195.411/270.149/398.957/42.300 ms

    155的那个不对劲,再测,我去。
    --- 155.94.173.121 ping statistics ---
    14 packets transmitted, 14 received, 0% packet loss, time 13022ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 198.892/210.517/239.744/13.820 ms
    popu111
        18
    popu111  
       2015-01-07 17:09:59 +08:00
    多少买的?
    YAFEIML
        19
    YAFEIML  
    OP
       2015-01-07 17:12:48 +08:00
    @zdkmygod 我这也不太正常,目测机房在调整。。。我今天发了N多tk
    bingu
        20
    bingu  
       2015-01-07 17:15:17 +08:00
    @YAFEIML 电信
    YAFEIML
        21
    YAFEIML  
    OP
       2015-01-07 17:15:32 +08:00
    popu111
        22
    popu111  
       2015-01-07 17:17:35 +08:00
    @YAFEIML ping200-300属于米国优秀级了
    leopard080264
        23
    leopard080264  
       2015-01-07 17:17:57 +08:00
    楼主买的是哪家vps?bluevm吗,一直想找个好的colocrossing分销商

    上海电信

    iyuyue
        24
    iyuyue  
       2015-01-07 17:19:42 +08:00
    你的亚洲优化段:
    100%[======================================>] 52,428,800 12.9MB/s in 5.7s
    我的QuadraNet:
    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 19.8MB/s in 7.0s

    但是好像因为文件太小还没达到最高速度= =。。。能麻烦发个100MB的么?测试完就和你说
    leopard080264
        25
    leopard080264  
       2015-01-07 17:20:38 +08:00
    @popu11
    美西电信pop常年120-130ms什么级别,如上图
    给个邀请码用用你的ss给你详细反馈
    [email protected]
    YAFEIML
        26
    YAFEIML  
    OP
       2015-01-07 17:21:34 +08:00
    @popu111 ping高点无所谓啊,只要不丢包就不影响网站访问。
    popu111
        27
    popu111  
       2015-01-07 17:23:18 +08:00
    @YAFEIML 。。。会慢的吧
    YAFEIML
        28
    YAFEIML  
    OP
       2015-01-07 17:24:43 +08:00
    @iyuyue 好了,50改成100
    @leopard080264 TragicServers
    0x142857
        29
    0x142857  
       2015-01-07 17:28:25 +08:00
    KchanZendeMacBook-Air:dev kchanzen$ ping 96.44.185.162
    PING 96.44.185.162 (96.44.185.162): 56 data bytes
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=408.453 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=406.393 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=356.692 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 4
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=331.672 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 6
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 7
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=514.734 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=379.062 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=494.095 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=414.866 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 12
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=13 ttl=50 time=379.119 ms
    Request timeout for icmp_seq 14
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=496.077 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=16 ttl=50 time=413.221 ms
    64 bytes from 96.44.185.162: icmp_seq=17 ttl=50 time=443.795 ms
    ^C
    --- 96.44.185.162 ping statistics ---
    18 packets transmitted, 12 packets received, 33.3% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 331.672/419.848/514.734/55.050 ms

    成都电信 在寝室蹭的网
    YAFEIML
        30
    YAFEIML  
    OP
       2015-01-07 17:29:51 +08:00
    @0x142857 跪了啊
    iyuyue
        31
    iyuyue  
       2015-01-07 17:39:04 +08:00
    @YAFEIML 额。。。你好像只是改了名字= =
    gqfBzoLVY3Wl4Tng
        32
    gqfBzoLVY3Wl4Tng  
       2015-01-07 17:44:09 +08:00

    没超过10k
    50M 广东电信
    maxduke
        33
    maxduke  
       2015-01-07 17:50:57 +08:00
    @lolicon 很多美国的IP其实不叠加 国际精品网 ping值会更好,只是高峰时期 丢包厉害......
    Tink
        34
    Tink  
       2015-01-07 18:14:01 +08:00 via iPhone
    我是普通的8mb电信光纤
    YAFEIML
        35
    YAFEIML  
    OP
       2015-01-07 18:24:04 +08:00
    @iyuyue 忘记改次数了。。。
    bugeye
        36
    bugeye  
       2015-01-07 18:29:27 +08:00
    现在电信出国真是。。。。
    amd00
        37
    amd00  
       2015-01-07 18:29:33 +08:00
    南京电信20兆网络
    155.94.173.121 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 117,已接收 = 107,丢失 = 10 (8% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 217ms,最长 = 420ms,平均 = 294ms
    96.44.185.162 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 161,已接收 = 142,丢失 = 19 (11% 丢失),
    往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 192ms,最长 = 368ms,平均 = 297ms
    实际浏览器文件下载速度在20k/s左右,但用idm的多线程在1.6m/s,没跑满带宽
    levy
        38
    levy  
       2015-01-07 21:13:29 +08:00 via Android
    我用的是buyvm的,很不人性化,买了三个vps,一个欠费都停机,让人无语。
    ven
        39
    ven  
       2015-01-07 21:56:12 +08:00
    杭州移动,下载800k/s 牛逼
    zhaohai
        40
    zhaohai  
       2015-01-07 21:59:03 +08:00
    哪里的?连接
    YAFEIML
        41
    YAFEIML  
    OP
       2015-01-08 00:12:22 +08:00
    @iyuyue 这俩文件到这个点跑了近400G流量,我了个擦了。。。删除了
    iyuyue
        42
    iyuyue  
       2015-01-08 10:00:49 +08:00
    @YAFEIML 哦哦,我后来下载也还是50M的。还是多谢了~~
    YAFEIML
        43
    YAFEIML  
    OP
       2015-01-08 14:27:55 +08:00
    @iyuyue 客气了
    iyuyue
        44
    iyuyue  
       2015-01-08 14:35:03 +08:00
    @YAFEIML 哈哈
    MASAILA
        45
    MASAILA  
       2015-01-08 14:36:27 +08:00
    这是哪家vps呢
    YAFEIML
        46
    YAFEIML  
    OP
       2015-01-08 14:51:48 +08:00
    @MASAILA 上面发的有,找找吧
    datou
        47
    datou  
       2015-01-08 15:04:47 +08:00
    帝都联通150ms延迟
    MASAILA
        48
    MASAILA  
       2015-01-08 15:08:55 +08:00
    @YAFEIML 找到了 thankyou~
    关于   ·   帮助文档   ·   博客   ·   API   ·   FAQ   ·   实用小工具   ·   991 人在线   最高记录 6679   ·     Select Language
    创意工作者们的社区
    World is powered by solitude
    VERSION: 3.9.8.5 · 33ms · UTC 20:29 · PVG 04:29 · LAX 12:29 · JFK 15:29
    Developed with CodeLauncher
    ♥ Do have faith in what you're doing.